Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 02:03

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
N.J. doctors are using a party drug to send patients to ‘another planet.’ Yes, it’s legal. - NJ.com
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Did sharing a wife turn out okay?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Thank you.
Who is the most dangerous or evilest person of all time?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Father’s Day 2025: 28 gifts dads will actually want - The Verge
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Yankees Planning To Place Luke Weaver On Injured List - MLB Trade Rumors
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Have you ever had your crush reject you, and then later you all dated and married?
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
SpaceX May Be Failing to Get Starship Working at All - futurism.com